Gender Roles Family Structure Changes free essay sample

Today, people realize and see that there is not the same consensus of family dynamics and lifestyles that the 1950s demonstrated when the family life and gender roles became much more predictable (Coontz 36). An analysis of Stephanie Coontzs, What We Really Miss About the 1950s, along with the episodes of Leave It To Beaver, have revealed certain roles and structure of a quintessential family that clearly exhibits the definite changes in family dynamics today. Throughout Stephanie Coontzs essay, she emphasizes her idea of family structures in many situations. She argues that shows such as Leave It to Beaver were not the way families really were [†¦] people watched them to see how families were supposed to live and also to get a little reassurance that they were headed in the right direction (38). Here, readers should realize that these sitcoms that were watched were advertisements to families in a way to demonstrate the American Dream. We will write a custom essay sample on Gender Roles Family Structure Changes or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page For example these episodes served as a guide to how to raise their children, organize their marriage, and have the perfect family structure. Today, we hardly ever see any television shows demonstrating these types of problems. We typically see more of reality television shows broadcasting the ideas of being the perfect individual, rather than a perfect family through celebrities and figures we praise and look up to. Also, television shows like Family Guy, portray the opposite of family structures in the 1950s, revealing more of a un-idyllic household including disrespectful children and irresponsible parents. In contrast to Family Guy, several episodes of Leave It To Beaver demonstrated a 1950s family structure that society looked upon. In the episode The Perfect Father, Ward Cleaver comes into the living room explaining to his children, you dont want to leave all of these newspapers on the ground for your mother to pick up (Leave It To Beaver). In this scene, a viewer can infer that since Ward works hard during the day, the role of June Cleaver as a woman is to clean up after every single mess the family makes in the household. Along with this, June appears in every scene with some type of a domestic sphere. For example, she is constantly in the kitchen either cooking or cleaning for her family. Even if she leaves the household, she continues her gender role of being a mother/woman by going grocery shopping for her husband and children. In society today, there are plenty mothers that keep up with their gender role from the 1950s, along with men too. We constantly see fathers taking care of their families as well; cleaning, cooking, and going grocery shopping. Also, women today work full time to take responsibility in the family, not just men. Its a part of parenting nowadays to take care of ones family even if it means doing domestic activities. It is important in society today to work together as parents, on taking that role of putting your children first. Coontz periodically talks about family structure in her essay about how very few young people spent any extended period of time in a nonfamily setting: They moved from their parents family into their own family, after just a brief experience with independent living, and they started having children soon after marriage (Coontz 36). It seems that in the 1950s, people wanted to start their families at an early age; they were quick to build that ideal family lifestyle and structure. Through the lens of the 1950s society, it was essential to form a perfect family, and starting at and early age would give you more time to successfully fulfill that dream. Young Americans today do not rush into having a family because most put their education and career first. They stay at their parents care, living at their house as long as possible, to successfully earn an education and start their career. Once they have started their career, that is when the individual settles down, gets married, and starts a family. A lot of people in society today know that it is key to be financially stable to start a family, so that way there are no struggles. People in the 1950s clearly thought that making the decision to begin a family at a young age was not looked down upon because families are what made them happy, money was not an issue. It is clear that certain gender roles and family structure has changed throughout the years, especially since the 1950s, throughout the analysis of Stephanie Coontzs, What We Really Miss About the 1950s and episodes of Leave It To Beaver. As a scholar, I see the differences in family dynamics in several ways. Certain gender roles have changed, but are still there. For example, in the episode The Perfect Father, Ward tries his hardest to compete with Mr. Dennison in who is the better father when he realizes his children are spending more time at his house (Leave It To Beaver). In todays society, we see fathers always competing with other fathers in everything that they do; wether it is sports, the working world, or with their children. Although some of these gender role changes are not meant to be a bad thing, it is important to see that it takes the effort of two to create a respectful, perfect family structure. Maybe even someday in the near future, women and men will not be defined by their gender, but sometimes it is necessary for a mother to take on domestic roles, and a father to take on masculine roles. What people do not really understand is the meaning of family: no matter what roles the mother or father take on, how early a couple decides to start a family, how many children a married couple decides to have, or where to live its about family love and the happiness it brings.

Individual, community and macro points of view on migration Essays

Individual, community and macro points of view on migration Essays Individual, community and macro points of view on migration Essay Individual, community and macro points of view on migration Essay Migration does not always coupled with growth unless it was given proper measures and economic restructuring (Appleyard: 1992; Hammar et al. : 1997;Ghosh: 1998). The major reason for migration is considered to be for economic purposes. History showed evidences that the immigrants and their descendants play an important role in the economic growth of the host countries. Developed countries which welcome immigrants become richer and richer. In addition to the openness of the immigrants to all types of work, they can also work under cheap labor that the natives will reject.This allows the old businesses such as textiles and garments to still exist adding to the income of the host country. Migration of skilled workers will further strengthen the skills and talents pool of the country. These enhance their productivity and economical gains. Simultaneous with the gain of brain and skills of the host country is the loss of the brain and skills of the country of origin which are oftentimes the poor countries or the developing countries. This may bring brain drain or loss of the trained, educated and skilled individuals which will inhibit the development of the native country or country of origin.Dependence to foreign countries will be one of the consequences of this which will post negative effect on productivity and economy of the native country. Some researchers, however, regarded immigration to contribute to economic growth of the native country through the remittances that the immigrants send to their family. These remittances are the major source of foreign exchange in developing countries which alleviate the poverty line. According to the International Migration Data, global remittances to developing countries worldwide are estimated at $204 billion per year.(International migration data) The countries who registered the highest remittances are Mexico, India, Philippines, Egypt and Morocco. ( International migration data) This enormous value made the home countries considered their emigrants to have the major role in improving its economy. It contributed to the fluidity of cash flow and development of business sectors. Realization of the major participation of emigrants’ remittances made the home government sets priority regarding the welfare of these workers.Researches showed that these remittances tend to be invested to the home country for housing, consumption, land, loan payment and savings and to business which the home government targets. (Addy, p. 16) Their families are well supported in establishing their own business in the country and given other privileges. The increasing value of remittances and the business established are expected to balance the effect of brain drain, the source country is experiencing. At the personal level, the immigrant faces a quandary on culture and environment.Furthermore, in the foreign land, he is also vulnerable to racial discrimination, exploitation and deportation. He is forced to embrace whatever is offered to him for a common good. Coping with these adaptations to host country’s norms and practices simultaneous with physically adapting to climate and health conditions requires a great level of energy and determination. Absence of the family members also adds to the burden the immigrant is experiencing. New technologies of communication help in this endeavor which makes it easier to gain emotional stability.Both positive and negative effects do not limit to the individual alone. Whatever happens to the immigrant in the host country will definitely affect his family in the home country. Studies showed that the family is more affected when the migrant worker is a woman for basically she is the homemaker and takes care of the children. Nowadays, there is an increasing number of migrant women accounting for 48 per cent international migrants. Some effects radiates from the family to the community. The flow of income, for example can be manifested in the economics within the area.This will be radiated further to the home country reducing the poverty. They also contribute to development through investments, business or entrepreneurial activities and the return of newly developed skills and knowledge. The community of the host country, on the other hand, may initially be skeptical of accepting the immigrant. On their point of view, the immigrants can change and influence their economy and other values. A community which does not allow immigrants may be giving up the values, education, perhaps specialization and other benefits brought by the immigrants.